The intervention of a modulator with learning disabled children

Tested the role of a child modulator, an investigator, and coordinator of services for learning disabled children. Ninety regular third‐ and fourth‐ grade children with average intelligence were selected from a population of 1,030 children on the basis of low scores on the Pupil Rating Scale and at...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical psychology Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 972 - 976
Main Authors Pihl, R. O., Parkes, Murielle, Drake, Harriet, Vrana, Francois
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brandon Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.10.1980
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI10.1002/1097-4679(198010)36:4<972::AID-JCLP2270360427>3.0.CO;2-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:Tested the role of a child modulator, an investigator, and coordinator of services for learning disabled children. Ninety regular third‐ and fourth‐ grade children with average intelligence were selected from a population of 1,030 children on the basis of low scores on the Pupil Rating Scale and at least one of four Metropolitan Achievement subtests and were assigned randomly to one of three groups. The first group received the services of the modulator for a 6‐month period, while the respective schools were informed of the teachers' ratings and achievement test scores for the second group, and the third group was an untreated control. In addition to the selection procedures, school grades, the Piers‐Harris Self‐Concept Scale and the Connors Parents Questionnaire were completed before and after treatment. The results showed teacher ratings and achievement score changes for all groups with the modulation group superior only in teacher ratings of Personal‐Social behavior. Follow‐up testing 18 months later between the modulated and school informed group within the Piers‐Harris Scale and ratings by unbiased teachers reflected numerous differences, which suggests a growing self‐confidence in the modulated Ss. The positive usefulness of this form of intervention in meeting the general needs of the child and in treating the concomitants of school failure are discussed.
Bibliography:istex:597A5107D4BD519DE4DB7214C3FF4D01D11820EF
ark:/67375/WNG-318QMQ7Q-7
ArticleID:JCLP2270360427
This project was supported by Health Programmes Branch, Health and Welfare Canada and The South Shore Chapter of the Quebec Association for Children With Learning Disabilities.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(198010)36:4<972::AID-JCLP2270360427>3.0.CO;2-5