Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a large cohort of all-comers undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Comparison of five contrast media

There is controversy as to whether iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) are associated with lower risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), compared with low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). We aimed to evaluate if a differential risk of CI-AKI exists after percutaneous coronary intervention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of cardiology Vol. 273; pp. 69 - 73
Main Authors Azzalini, Lorenzo, Vilca, Luz María, Lombardo, Francesca, Poletti, Enrico, Laricchia, Alessandra, Beneduce, Alessandro, Maccagni, Davide, Demir, Ozan M., Slavich, Massimo, Giannini, Francesco, Carlino, Mauro, Margonato, Alberto, Cappelletti, Alberto, Colombo, Antonio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 15.12.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0167-5273
1874-1754
1874-1754
DOI10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.097

Cover

More Information
Summary:There is controversy as to whether iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM) are associated with lower risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), compared with low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM). We aimed to evaluate if a differential risk of CI-AKI exists after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) according to different contrast media (CM) types. We performed a single-center retrospective study in a cohort of all-comers undergoing PCI between January 2012 and December 2016. CI-AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dl or ≥50% within 72 h from PCI. IOCM were represented by iodixanol, whereas four different LOCM were utilized (ioversol, iopromide, iomeprol, iobitridol). Multiple-treatment inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to identify whether CM type was an independent predictor of CI-AKI. We included 2648 subjects (ioversol, n = 272; iopromide, n = 818; iomeprol, n = 611; iobitridol, n = 460; iodixanol, n = 487). CI-AKI occurred in 300 patients (11.7%) overall, with no differences across CM groups (ioversol 13.0%, iopromide 11.5%, iomeprol 10.2%, iobitridol 13.9%, iodixanol 11.3%; p = 0.42). CI-AKI requiring dialysis was observed in 8 patients (0.3%) overall (p = 0.50). On IPTW-adjusted analysis, none of the LOCM was associated with a significantly different risk of CI-AKI compared with iodixanol: ioversol OR 0.986 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.611–1.591), iopromide OR 0.870 (95% CI 0.606–1.250), iomeprol OR 0.904 (95% CI 0.619–1.319), iobitridol OR 1.258 (95% CI 0.850–1.861). In a large cohort of all-comers undergoing PCI, there were no differences in the adjusted risk of CI-AKI across 4 LOCM, compared with iodixanol. •Contrast-induced acute kidney injury has a high incidence (11.7%) in all-comers undergoing (mostly complex) PCI•The unadjusted rates of contrast-induced acute kidney injury are similar across five different types of contrast media•Contrast-induced acute kidney injury requiring dialysis was observed in only 0.3% of patients•The adjusted risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury was similar across low-osmolar and iso-osmolar contrast media
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.097