Spine fracture prevalence in a nationally representative sample of US women and men aged ≥40 years: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014

Summary Spine fracture prevalence is similar in men and women, increasing from <5 % in those <60 to 11 % in those 70–79 and 18 % in those ≥80 years. Prevalence was higher with age, lower bone mineral density (BMD), and in those meeting criteria for spine imaging. Most subjects with spine fract...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOsteoporosis international Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 1857 - 1866
Main Authors Cosman, F., Krege, J. H., Looker, A. C., Schousboe, J. T., Fan, B., Sarafrazi Isfahani, N., Shepherd, J. A., Krohn, K. D., Steiger, P., Wilson, K. E., Genant, H. K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Springer London 01.06.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0937-941X
1433-2965
1433-2965
DOI10.1007/s00198-017-3948-9

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary Spine fracture prevalence is similar in men and women, increasing from <5 % in those <60 to 11 % in those 70–79 and 18 % in those ≥80 years. Prevalence was higher with age, lower bone mineral density (BMD), and in those meeting criteria for spine imaging. Most subjects with spine fractures were unaware of them. Introduction Spine fractures have substantial medical significance but are seldom recognized. This study collected contemporary nationally representative spine fracture prevalence data. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of 3330 US adults aged ≥40 years participating in NHANES 2013–2014 with evaluable Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA). VFA was graded by semiquantitative measurement. BMD and an osteoporosis questionnaire were collected. Results Overall spine fracture prevalence was 5.4 % and similar in men and women. Prevalence increased with age from <5 % in those <60 to 11 % in those 70–79 and 18 % in those ≥80 years. Fractures were more common in non-Hispanic whites and in people with lower body mass index and BMD. Among subjects with spine fracture, 26 % met BMD criteria for osteoporosis. Prevalence was higher in subjects who met National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) criteria for spine imaging (14 vs 4.7 %, P  < 0.001). Only 8 % of people with a spine fracture diagnosed by VFA had a self-reported fracture, and among those who self-reported a spine fracture, only 21 % were diagnosed with fracture by VFA. Conclusion Spine fracture prevalence is similar in women and men and increases with age and lower BMD, although most subjects with spine fracture do not meet BMD criteria for osteoporosis. Since most (>90 %) individuals were unaware of their spine fractures, lateral spine imaging is needed to identify these women and men. Spine fracture prevalence was threefold higher in individuals meeting NOF criteria for spine imaging (∼1 in 7 undergoing VFA). Identifying spine fractures as part of comprehensive risk assessment may improve clinical decision making.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0937-941X
1433-2965
1433-2965
DOI:10.1007/s00198-017-3948-9