Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes

Multinomial processing tree (MPT) models account for observed categorical responses by assuming a finite number of underlying cognitive processes. We propose a general method that allows for the inclusion of response times (RTs) into any kind of MPT model to measure the relative speed of the hypothe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychonomic bulletin & review Vol. 23; no. 5; pp. 1440 - 1465
Main Authors Heck, Daniel W., Erdfelder, Edgar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer US 01.10.2016
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1069-9384
1531-5320
1531-5320
DOI10.3758/s13423-016-1025-6

Cover

More Information
Summary:Multinomial processing tree (MPT) models account for observed categorical responses by assuming a finite number of underlying cognitive processes. We propose a general method that allows for the inclusion of response times (RTs) into any kind of MPT model to measure the relative speed of the hypothesized processes. The approach relies on the fundamental assumption that observed RT distributions emerge as mixtures of latent RT distributions that correspond to different underlying processing paths. To avoid auxiliary assumptions about the shape of these latent RT distributions, we account for RTs in a distribution-free way by splitting each observed category into several bins from fast to slow responses, separately for each individual. Given these data, latent RT distributions are parameterized by probability parameters for these RT bins, and an extended MPT model is obtained. Hence, all of the statistical results and software available for MPT models can easily be used to fit, test, and compare RT-extended MPT models. We demonstrate the proposed method by applying it to the two-high-threshold model of recognition memory.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1069-9384
1531-5320
1531-5320
DOI:10.3758/s13423-016-1025-6