The Representation of Coordinate Relations in Lexical Semantic Memory

Two experiments examined the size of the typicality effect for true items in a category verification task as a function of the type of false item used. In Experiment 1, compared to the case where false items paired unrelated concepts ("carrot-vehicle"), the typicality effect was much large...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 11; p. 98
Main Author Gruenenfelder, Thomas M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 11.02.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00098

Cover

More Information
Summary:Two experiments examined the size of the typicality effect for true items in a category verification task as a function of the type of false item used. In Experiment 1, compared to the case where false items paired unrelated concepts ("carrot-vehicle"), the typicality effect was much larger when false items paired an exemplar with a category coordinate to its proper category ("carrot-fruit"). In contrast, when false items paired coordinate concepts ("carrot-pea") or reversed the ordering of subject and predicate terms ("All vegetables are carrots"), the typicality effect did not change in size. Further, the time to verify true sentences did not increase monotonically with the semantic similarity of the two terms used in false sentences. Experiment 2 showed that the pattern of results for coordinate items reflected semantic processing, not simply task difficulty. A combined analysis examined data across multiple experiments, increasing the power of the statistical analysis. The size of the typicality effect when coordinate false items were used was again the same as when false items paired unrelated concepts. The most straightforward explanation of this pattern of results seems to be in terms of a model of lexical semantic memory, in which labeled links are used to indicate the semantic relation that exists between pairs of words.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Reviewed by: Fritz Gunther, University of Milano Bicocca, Italy; Gregory L. Murphy, New York University, United States
Edited by: Rolf Ulrich, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00098