Diagnostic Assessment of Search Controls and Failure Modes in Many-Objective Evolutionary Optimization

The growing popularity of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) for solving many-objective problems warrants the careful investigation of their search controls and failure modes. This study contributes a new diagnostic assessment framework for rigorously evaluating the effectiveness, reliab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEvolutionary computation Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 423 - 452
Main Authors Hadka, David, Reed, Patrick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA MIT Press 01.09.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1063-6560
1530-9304
1530-9304
DOI10.1162/EVCO_a_00053

Cover

More Information
Summary:The growing popularity of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) for solving many-objective problems warrants the careful investigation of their search controls and failure modes. This study contributes a new diagnostic assessment framework for rigorously evaluating the effectiveness, reliability, efficiency, and controllability of MOEAs as well as identifying their search controls and failure modes. The framework is demonstrated using the recently introduced Borg MOEA, -NSGA-II, -MOEA, IBEA, OMOPSO, GDE3, MOEA/D, SPEA2, and NSGA-II on 33 instances of 18 test problems from the DTLZ, WFG, and CEC 2009 test suites. The diagnostic framework exploits Sobol's variance decomposition to provide guidance on the algorithms’ non-separable, multi-parameter controls when performing a many-objective search. This study represents one of the most comprehensive empirical assessments of MOEAs ever completed.
Bibliography:Fall, 2012
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1063-6560
1530-9304
1530-9304
DOI:10.1162/EVCO_a_00053