Interdisciplinary collaboration in critical care alarm research: A bibliometric analysis

• Published in: International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Vol. 181; p. 105285
• Main Authors: Agha-Mir-Salim, Louis, McCullum, Lucas, Dähnert, Enrico, Scheel, Yanick-Daniel, Wilson, Ainsley, Carpio, Marianne, Chan, Carmen, Lo, Claudia, Maher, Lindsay, Dressler, Corinna, Balzer, Felix, Celi, Leo Anthony, Poncette, Akira-Sebastian, Pelter, Michele M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Alarm fatigue; Engineering; False alarm; Intensive care; Interdisciplinary; Nursing; False alarm; Engineering; Alarm fatigue; Intensive care; Interdisciplinary; Nursing
• ISSN: 1386-5056; 1872-8243; 1872-8243
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105285

•Bibliometric analyses can be used to quantify collaboration across disciplines.•Nurses' perspectives are critical to understanding and addressing alarm fatigue.•Engineering publications on alarm reduction lack nurses’ perspectives as end-users.•Interdisciplinary collaboration is imperative for sustainable adoption of technology. Alarm fatigue in nurses is a major patient safety concern in the intensive care unit. This is caused by exposure to high rates of false and non-actionable alarms. Despite decades of research, the problem persists, leading to stress, burnout, and patient harm resulting from true missed events. While engineering approaches to reduce false alarms have spurred hope, they appear to lack collaboration between nurses and engineers to produce real-world solutions. The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to examine the relevant literature to quantify the level of authorial collaboration between nurses, physicians, and engineers. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of articles on alarm fatigue and false alarm reduction strategies in critical care published between 2010 and 2022. Data were extracted at the article and author level. The percentages of author disciplines per publication were calculated by study design, journal subject area, and other article-level factors. A total of 155 articles with 583 unique authors were identified. While 31.73 % (n = 185) of the unique authors had a nursing background, publications using an engineering study design (n = 46), e.g., model development, had a very low involvement of nursing authors (mean proportion at 1.09 %). Observational studies (n = 58) and interventional studies (n = 33) had a higher mean involvement of 52.27 % and 47.75 %, respectively. Articles published in nursing journals (n = 32) had the highest mean proportion of nursing authors (80.32 %), while those published in engineering journals (n = 46) had the lowest (9.00 %), with 6 (13.04 %) articles having one or more nurses as co-authors. Minimal involvement of nursing expertise in alarm research utilizing engineering methodologies may be one reason for the lack of successful, real-world solutions to ameliorate alarm fatigue. Fostering a collaborative, interdisciplinary research culture can promote a common publication culture across fields and may yield sustainable implementation of technological solutions in healthcare.