Ocular oscillations induced by shifts of the direction and depth of visual fixation

Shifts of the point of fixation between two targets aligned on one eye that are located near and far (Müller paradigm) stimulates a combined saccadic‐vergence movement. In normal subjects, this test paradigm often induces saccadic oscillations of about 0.3 degrees at 20 to 30 Hz. We measured eye mov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of neurology Vol. 49; no. 1; pp. 24 - 28
Main Authors Bhidayasiri, Roongroj, Somers, Jeffrey T., Kim, Jae I., Ramat, Stefano, Nayak, Sagarika, Bokil, Harshad S., Leigh, R. John
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2001
Willey-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0364-5134
1531-8249
DOI10.1002/1531-8249(200101)49:1<24::AID-ANA6>3.0.CO;2-T

Cover

More Information
Summary:Shifts of the point of fixation between two targets aligned on one eye that are located near and far (Müller paradigm) stimulates a combined saccadic‐vergence movement. In normal subjects, this test paradigm often induces saccadic oscillations of about 0.3 degrees at 20 to 30 Hz. We measured eye movements using the magnetic search coil technique in 2 patients recovering from viral opsoclonus‐myoclonus syndrome, comparing saccadic‐vergence responses to the Müller paradigm with conjugate saccades between distant targets. Both patients exhibited intermittent conjugate ocular oscillations of about 4 to 5 degrees amplitude at about 10 Hz. Combined saccadic‐vergence movements induced these oscillations twice as often as did conjugate saccades. One patient also exhibited disjunctive ocular oscillations at 10 Hz while sustaining fixation on the near target. The Müller paradigm provides a useful clinical and experimental technique for inducing saccadic oscillations. The probable mechanism is that pontine omnipause neurons, which normally gate saccades, are inhibited during the sustained vergence movement that follows the saccadic component of the response to the Müller paradigm. Ann Neurol 2001;49:24–28
Bibliography:Evenor Armington Fund
United States Public Health Service - No. EY06717
Korea Research Foundation
Office of Research and Development, Medical Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs
istex:D483CFBBE61DCE174A370F2F43E14C1EBCABC5A9
ArticleID:ANA6
ark:/67375/WNG-FQG0V2TZ-2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0364-5134
1531-8249
DOI:10.1002/1531-8249(200101)49:1<24::AID-ANA6>3.0.CO;2-T