Conceptual differentiation, integration and empathic prediction

Several investigators have examined the relationship of a rater's cognitive complexity to accurate empathic prediction of a target's self‐concept or behavior, with mixed results. The present study sought to clarify this relation by considering both the conceptual differentiation (functiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of personality Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 185 - 191
Main Authors Neimeyer, Robert A., Neimeyer, Greg J., Landfield, A. W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.1983
Blackwell
Duke University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-3506
1467-6494
DOI10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00861.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Several investigators have examined the relationship of a rater's cognitive complexity to accurate empathic prediction of a target's self‐concept or behavior, with mixed results. The present study sought to clarify this relation by considering both the conceptual differentiation (functionally independent construction) and integration (ordination) of both rater and target as they bear on predictive accuracy at early and later stages of acquaintance. Two sets of ten subjects participated in weekly self‐disclosure groups, and attempted to predict one another's self‐ratings on personal constructs after four and eighteen weeks of structured dyadic interaction. Results suggested that (a) the conceptual structure of the rater was unrelated to predictive accuracy, (b) high differentiated/low integrated targets were less accurately predicted at Time 1, (c) raters generally became more accurate predictors over time, and (d) conceptual structure was related to predictive accuracy at early, but not advanced stages of relationship. These findings were interpreted within an expanded theoretical framework emphasizing the multidimensional assessment of cognitive complexity as well as the stage of acquaintance at which social prediction takes place.
Bibliography:istex:D7AB52EED5B5A858C71DAE32C3614F9118DF6993
ArticleID:JOPY185
ark:/67375/WNG-PS9Z2024-Q
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0022-3506
1467-6494
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00861.x