Functional capacity of prediabetic patients: effect of multimodal prehabilitation in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection

Prehabilitation is the process of increasing functional capacity (FC) before surgery. Poor glycemic control is associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. Therefore, prediabetic patients could particularly benefit from prehabilitation. This is a pooled analysis of individual patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa oncologica Vol. 60; no. 8; pp. 1025 - 1031
Main Authors Chabot, Katherine, Gillis, Chelsia, Minnella, Enrico Maria, Ferreira, Vanessa, Awasthi, Rashami, Baldini, Gabriele, Carli, Francesco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 03.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0284-186X
1651-226X
1651-226X
DOI10.1080/0284186X.2021.1937307

Cover

More Information
Summary:Prehabilitation is the process of increasing functional capacity (FC) before surgery. Poor glycemic control is associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. Therefore, prediabetic patients could particularly benefit from prehabilitation. This is a pooled analysis of individual patient data from three multimodal prehabilitation trials in colorectal cancer surgery. Following a baseline assessment using the 6-minute walking test (6MWT), subjects were randomized to multimodal prehabilitation or to a control group. Participants were reassessed 24 h before surgery and 4 weeks after surgery. Prediabetes (PreDM) was defined as HbA1c 5.7%-6.4%. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potentially confounding variables. Participation in a prehabilitation program was the most important predictive factor of clinical improvement in FC prior to surgery (Adjusted OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.18, 4.94); prediabetes was not a statistically significant predictor of improvement in FC after adjustments for covariates. Prehabilitation attenuated the loss of FC in unadjusted analyses after surgery in prediabetic patients (PreDM Control: median change −6 m [IQR −50-20] vs PreDM Prehab: median change +25 m [IQR −20-53], p = 0.045). Adjusted analyses also suggested the protective effect against loss of FC after surgery was stronger in prediabetic patients (PreDM Prehab vs PreDM Control: OR 5.5, 95% CI: 1.2-25.8; Normo Prehab vs Normo Control: OR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.53-4.52). Multimodal prehabilitation favored clinical recovery of FC after surgery in CRC patients, especially prediabetic patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0284-186X
1651-226X
1651-226X
DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2021.1937307