Wireless monitoring algorithm for wind turbine blades using Piezo‐electric energy harvesters

Wind turbine blade failure can be catastrophic and lead to unexpected power interruptions. In this paper, a Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) algorithm is presented for wireless monitoring of wind turbine blades. The SHM algorithm utilizes accumulated strain energy data, such as would be acquired b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWind energy (Chichester, England) Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 551 - 565
Main Authors Lim, Dong‐Won, Mantell, Susan C., Seiler, Peter J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bognor Regis John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1095-4244
1099-1824
1099-1824
DOI10.1002/we.2023

Cover

More Information
Summary:Wind turbine blade failure can be catastrophic and lead to unexpected power interruptions. In this paper, a Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) algorithm is presented for wireless monitoring of wind turbine blades. The SHM algorithm utilizes accumulated strain energy data, such as would be acquired by piezoelectric materials. The SHM algorithm compares the accumulated strain energy at the same position on the three blades. This exploits the inherent triple redundancy of the blades and avoids the need for a structural model of the blade. The performance of the algorithm is evaluated using probabilistic metrics such as detection probability (True Positive) and false alarm rate (False Positive). The decision time is chosen to be sufficiently long that a particular damage level can be detected even in the presence of system sensor noise and wind variations. Finally, the proposed algorithm is evaluated with a case study of a utility‐scale turbine. The noise level is based on measurements acquired from strain sensors mounted on the blades of a Clipper Liberty C96 turbine. Strain energy changes associated with damage from matrix cracking and delamination are simulated with a finite element model. The case study demonstrates that the proposed algorithm can detect damage with a high probability based on a decision time period of approximately 50–200 days. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1095-4244
1099-1824
1099-1824
DOI:10.1002/we.2023