Can upper cervical manual therapy affect the blink reflex in subjects with migraine and neck pain?

Neck pain is a common complaint among migraineurs possibly due to the anatomic connections between cervical and trigeminal afferents in the trigeminocervical complex (TCC). Manual therapy (MT) is used in the management of headache disorders, with demonstrable neurophysiological effects. The blink re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 190 - 197
Main Authors Jafari, Mehdi, Bahrpeyma, Farid, Togha, Mansoureh, Hall, Toby, Vahabizad, Fahimeh, Jafari, Elham
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1066-9817
2042-6186
2042-6186
DOI10.1080/10669817.2023.2250172

Cover

More Information
Summary:Neck pain is a common complaint among migraineurs possibly due to the anatomic connections between cervical and trigeminal afferents in the trigeminocervical complex (TCC). Manual therapy (MT) is used in the management of headache disorders, with demonstrable neurophysiological effects. The blink reflex (BR) is one method of analyzing neurophysiological effects in headache patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of upper cervical spine MT on BR in subjects with migraine and neck pain. Twenty subjects were assigned to a medication plus MT (MedMT) group (  = 10) and medication plus sham MT (sham MT) group (  = 10). After random assignment, all patients underwent testing for the BR (R1, R2, R2c responses). Then, subjects in group MedMT and group sham MT received either 4 sessions of MT or sham MT to the upper cervical spine. After completion of the intervention, BR testing was repeated. There were no significant differences in both side R1 latency between group MT and group sham MT (  > 0.050). For both sides, R2 latencies were significantly prolonged in MedMT group compared with sham MT group (  < 0.050). Subjects in MedMT group showed significant prolongation in right and left R2c latency compared with sham MT group (  < 0.050). The present study demonstrated that upper cervical MT affected trigeminal nociceptive neurotransmission in subjects with migraine and neck pain as reflected by changes in the BR. The increase in BR late response latencies of BR indicates an inhibitory effect of upper cervical spine MT on the TCC in these subjects. Trial Registration: The trial design was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT ID: IRCT20160621028567N2, url: https://www.irct.ir/) before the first patient was enrolled.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1066-9817
2042-6186
2042-6186
DOI:10.1080/10669817.2023.2250172