Is There Still Any Role for Oxidative Stress in Mitochondrial DNA-Dependent Aging?

Recent deep sequencing data has provided compelling evidence that the spectrum of somatic point mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in aging tissues lacks G > T transversion mutations. This fact cannot, however, be used as an argument for the missing contribution of reactive oxygen species (RO...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGenes Vol. 9; no. 4; p. 175
Main Authors Zsurka, Gábor, Peeva, Viktoriya, Kotlyar, Alexander, Kunz, Wolfram
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 21.03.2018
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2073-4425
2073-4425
DOI10.3390/genes9040175

Cover

More Information
Summary:Recent deep sequencing data has provided compelling evidence that the spectrum of somatic point mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in aging tissues lacks G > T transversion mutations. This fact cannot, however, be used as an argument for the missing contribution of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to mitochondria-related aging because it is probably caused by the nucleotide selectivity of mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ (POLG). In contrast to point mutations, the age-dependent accumulation of mitochondrial DNA deletions is, in light of recent experimental data, still explainable by the segregation of mutant molecules generated by the direct mutagenic effects of ROS (in particular, of HO· radicals formed from H2O2 by a Fenton reaction). The source of ROS remains controversial, because the mitochondrial contribution to tissue ROS production is probably lower than previously thought. Importantly, in the discussion about the potential role of oxidative stress in mitochondria-dependent aging, ROS generated by inflammation-linked processes and the distribution of free iron also require careful consideration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2073-4425
2073-4425
DOI:10.3390/genes9040175