Circulating Chromogranin A as a Surveillance Biomarker in Patients with Carcinoids—The CASPAR Study
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are relatively indolent but can be more aggressive. The current recommendations for using serum chromogranin A (CgA) for patients with GEP-NET are equivocal. This study was designed to validate an automated CgA immunofluorescence assay for monit...
Saved in:
Published in | Clinical cancer research Vol. 30; no. 24; pp. 5559 - 5567 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Association for Cancer Research
16.12.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1078-0432 1557-3265 1557-3265 |
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1875 |
Cover
Summary: | Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are relatively indolent but can be more aggressive. The current recommendations for using serum chromogranin A (CgA) for patients with GEP-NET are equivocal. This study was designed to validate an automated CgA immunofluorescence assay for monitoring disease progression in patients with GEP-NET.
A prospective, multicenter, blinded observational study was designed to validate an automated CgA immunofluorescence assay for monitoring disease progression in patients with GEP-NET. Tumor progression was evaluated with RECIST 1.1 by CT/MRI. An increase ≥50% above the prior CgA concentration to a value >100 ng/mL in the following CgA concentration was considered positive.
A total of 153 patients with GEP-NET were enrolled. Using the prespecified cut-off of CgA change for tumor progression, specificity was 93.4% (95% confidence interval, 90.4%-95.5%; P < 0.001), sensitivity 34.4% (25.6%-44.3%), positive predictive value 57.9% (45.0-69.8), negative predictive value 84.3% (80.5-87.6), and AUC 0.73 (0.67-0.79).
Changes in serial measurements of serum CgA had a favorable specificity and negative predictive value, making this test a useful adjunct to routine radiographic monitoring. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Clin Cancer Res 2024;30:5559–67 |
ISSN: | 1078-0432 1557-3265 1557-3265 |
DOI: | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1875 |