Validation of Geant4 for silicon microdosimetry in heavy ion therapy

• Published in: Physics in medicine & biology Vol. 65; no. 4; pp. 45014 - 45027
• Main Authors: Bolst, D, Guatelli, S, Tran, L T, Chartier, L, Davis, J, Biasi, G, Prokopovich, D A, Pogossov, A, Reinhard, M I, Petasecca, M, Lerch, M L F, Matsufuji, N, Povoli, M, Summanwar, A, Kok, A, Jackson, M, Rosenfeld, A B
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England IOP Publishing 13.02.2020
• Subjects: Geant4; heavy ion therapy (HIT); microdosimetry; silicon-on-insulator (SOI); validation
• ISSN: 0031-9155; 1361-6560; 1361-6560
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab586a

Microdosimetry is a particularly powerful method to estimate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of any mixed radiation field. This is particularly convenient for therapeutic heavy ion therapy (HIT) beams, referring to ions larger than protons, where the RBE of the beam can vary significantly along the Bragg curve. Additionally, due to the sharp dose gradients at the end of the Bragg peak (BP), or spread out BP, to make accurate measurements and estimations of the biological properties of a beam a high spatial resolution is required, less than a millimetre. This requirement makes silicon microdosimetry particularly attractive due to the thicknesses of the sensitive volumes commonly being   10 m or less. Monte Carlo (MC) codes are widely used to study the complex mixed HIT radiation field as well as to model the response of novel microdosimeter detectors when irradiated with HIT beams. Therefore it is essential to validate MC codes against experimental measurements. This work compares measurements performed with a silicon microdosimeter in mono-energetic , and ion beams of therapeutic energies, against simulation results calculated with the Geant4 toolkit. Experimental and simulation results were compared in terms of microdosimetric spectra (dose lineal energy, ), the dose mean lineal energy, y D and the RBE10, as estimated by the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). Overall Geant4 showed reasonable agreement with experimental measurements. Before the distal edge of the BP, simulation and experiment agreed within   10% for y D and   2% for RBE10. Downstream of the BP less agreement was observed between simulation and experiment, particularly for the and beams. Simulation results downstream of the BP had lower values of y D and RBE10 compared to the experiment due to a higher contribution from lighter fragments compared to heavier fragments.