Improvement in cerebral function with treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are signature illnesses of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, but current diagnostic and therapeutic measures for these conditions are suboptimal. In our study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is used to try to diff...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Vol. 1208; no. 1; pp. 142 - 149 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        Malden, USA
          Blackwell Publishing Inc
    
        01.10.2010
     Wiley Subscription Services, Inc  | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0077-8923 1749-6632 1749-6632  | 
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05689.x | 
Cover
| Summary: | Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are signature illnesses of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, but current diagnostic and therapeutic measures for these conditions are suboptimal. In our study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is used to try to differentiate military service members with: PTSD and mTBI, PTSD alone, mTBI alone, and neither PTSD nor mTBI. Those with PTSD are then randomized to virtual reality exposure therapy or imaginal exposure. fMRI is repeated after treatment and along with the Clinician‐Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores to compare with baseline. Twenty subjects have completed baseline fMRI scans, including four controls and one mTBI only; of 15 treated for PTSD, eight completed posttreatment scans. Most subjects have been male (93%) and Caucasian (83%), with a mean age of 34. Significant improvements are evident on fMRI scans, and corroborated by CGI scores, but CAPS scores improvements are modest. In conclusion, CGI scores and fMRI scans indicate significant improvement in PTSD in both treatment arms, though CAPS score improvements are less robust. | 
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | istex:AAC11DC19273260D1B6E89BA399B97147F7E1A49 ark:/67375/WNG-CW9XJ4F8-W The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or opinions of the Department of the Army or Department of Defense. ArticleID:NYAS5689 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3  | 
| ISSN: | 0077-8923 1749-6632 1749-6632  | 
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05689.x |