Time between expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores

•Time between specific EDSS levels varies considerably depending on baseline EDSS.•Time spent between EDSS 4 to 6 is shorter than time between EDSS 0 to 3 or 6 to 8.•Time between EDSS scores is greatest for the intervals from 3.5 to 4 and 6 to 7.•EDSS functional system subscores help predict time sp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMultiple sclerosis and related disorders Vol. 30; pp. 98 - 103
Main Authors Zurawski, Jonathan, Glanz, Bonnie I., Chua, Alicia, Lokhande, Hrishikesh, Rotstein, Dalia, Weiner, Howard, Engler, David, Chitnis, Tanuja, Healy, Brian C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2211-0348
2211-0356
2211-0356
DOI10.1016/j.msard.2019.02.007

Cover

More Information
Summary:•Time between specific EDSS levels varies considerably depending on baseline EDSS.•Time spent between EDSS 4 to 6 is shorter than time between EDSS 0 to 3 or 6 to 8.•Time between EDSS scores is greatest for the intervals from 3.5 to 4 and 6 to 7.•EDSS functional system subscores help predict time spent at a given EDSS score.•EDSS functional system subscores predict risk of future EDSS disability accrual. Although the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) is the most commonly used measure of disability for multiple sclerosis, measurement of disability accumulation is complex due to the unequal steps of the scale. To estimate the time between EDSS scores in a large MS cohort from a single center and determine the impact of functional system scores on EDSS transitions. 31,394 clinical visits with EDSS scores from 2054 subjects in the CLIMB longitudinal cohort study were included in our analysis. The time to each EDSS score and the time between each EDSS score were calculated using the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate for interval censored data. For each initial EDSS value, the association between functional status scores and subsequent EDSS value was assessed using a mixed effects linear regression model, and the association with time to EDSS increase was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model. The median time until EDSS 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in all subjects were 4.8, 15.1, 28.2, 31.2, and 32.4 years, respectively. The time intervals showed that the disability accumulation intervals from EDSS 4 to 6 were much shorter than the accumulation intervals from EDSS 0 to 3 or from EDSS 6 to 8. For EDSS of 1 or 1.5, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel-bladder and mental system scores were associated with higher subsequent EDSS values. For higher EDSS values, only pyramidal and bowel-bladder scores maintained the association. Time between specific EDSS levels varies considerably. Certain functional system scores have greater predictive power for future EDSS-related disability despite same present EDSS level. These findings will assist in adaptation of the EDSS as an outcome measure to assess MS-related disability in clinical trials.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2211-0348
2211-0356
2211-0356
DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2019.02.007