On the nonlinear relationships between shadow economy and the three pillars of sustainable development: new evidence from panel threshold analysis

• Published in: Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 355 - 375
• Main Authors: Saafi, Sami, Nouira, Ridha, Assidi, Nadia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin De Gruyter 01.06.2023; Walter de Gruyter GmbH
• Subjects: Developed countries; Developing countries; Econometrics; Economic development; economic growth; Economics; Empirical analysis; Industrialized nations; Informal economy; LDCs; Nonlinear systems; panel threshold regression model; Panels; shadow economy; Shadows; Spillover effect; Sustainability; Sustainable development
• ISSN: 1558-3708; 1081-1826; 1558-3708
• DOI: 10.1515/snde-2021-0099

Most previous studies that examined the relationship between the size of shadow economy and the pillars of sustainable development maintained that this relationship is linear. This paper provides an empirical contribution to the literature by arguing that this relationship is likely to be nonlinear, and it might be subject to threshold effects. For this purpose, in addition to the static threshold panel model of Hansen (1999. “Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference.” 93 (2): 345–68), the dynamic panel threshold model suggested by Seo and Shin (2016. “Dynamic Panels with Threshold Effect and Endogeneity.” 195 (2): 169–86) has been applied to a larger panel-data set covering 83 developed and developing countries over the 1996–2017 period. Empirical results from both models yield evidence advocating the existence of threshold effects of the shadow economy on the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of sustainable development for the global sample as well as the sub-samples of developed and developing countries. Moreover, for the global sample and developing countries, our findings show that shadow economy would spoil the three sustainable development pillars only when its size exceeds a certain threshold critical size. While, the impact for developed countries was found negative even for low levels of underground activities. These finding are shown to be robust to alternative proxies for the size of the shadow economy and have important policy implications, especially for developing countries. In these countries, a moderate size of the shadow economy might have positive spillovers on long-term growth and sustainable development. Our research also suggests that, for developing and developed countries to achieve sustainable goal 8.3, the extent of the shadow activities should be taken into account.