Agreement Between Single Raters and Team Rating When Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health’s Rehabilitation Set
Objective: To quantify the agreement between functional assessments by a single rater and a team using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set in a clinical situation. Design: Inter-rater, multi-centre agreement study. Subjects...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of rehabilitation medicine Vol. 55; p. jrm14737 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Sweden
Medical Journals Sweden AB
04.12.2023
Medical Journals Sweden |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1651-2081 1650-1977 1651-2081 |
DOI | 10.2340/jrm.v55.14737 |
Cover
Summary: | Objective: To quantify the agreement between functional assessments by a single rater and a team using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set in a clinical situation.
Design: Inter-rater, multi-centre agreement study.
Subjects: A total of 193 adult inpatients admitted to 5 rehabilitation centres at 5 hospitals in China
Methods: The Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set was used by either a single rater or a team to assess 193 patients at 5 Chinese hospitals. Percentage of agreement and quadratic-weighted kappa coefficients were computed. Evaluation times were compared with paired t-tests.
Results: The mean team and individual evaluation times were not significantly different. The percentage of agreement ranged from 46.1% to 94.2% depending on the item, and the quadratic-weighted kappas ranged from 0.43 to 0.92. Eight categories (26.6%) showed a weighted kappa exceeding 0.4, 11 others (36.7%) exceeded 0.6, and another 11 (36.7%) produced kappas of more than 0.8.
Conclusion: Either a single rater or a team of raters can produce valid and consistent ratings when using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set to assess patients in a rehabilitation department. The team rating approach is suitable for clinical application. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1651-2081 1650-1977 1651-2081 |
DOI: | 10.2340/jrm.v55.14737 |