Agreement Between Single Raters and Team Rating When Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health’s Rehabilitation Set

Objective: To quantify the agreement between functional assessments by a single rater and a team using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set in a clinical situation. Design: Inter-rater, multi-centre agreement study. Subjects...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of rehabilitation medicine Vol. 55; p. jrm14737
Main Authors Zhang, Malan, Zhang, Yun, Sui, Minghong, Wang, Liyin, Lin, Ziling, Shen, Wei, Yu, Jiani, Yan, Tiebin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sweden Medical Journals Sweden AB 04.12.2023
Medical Journals Sweden
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1651-2081
1650-1977
1651-2081
DOI10.2340/jrm.v55.14737

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective: To quantify the agreement between functional assessments by a single rater and a team using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set in a clinical situation. Design: Inter-rater, multi-centre agreement study. Subjects: A total of 193 adult inpatients admitted to 5 rehabilitation centres at 5 hospitals in China Methods: The Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set was used by either a single rater or a team to assess 193 patients at 5 Chinese hospitals. Percentage of agreement and quadratic-weighted kappa coefficients were computed. Evaluation times were compared with paired t-tests. Results: The mean team and individual evaluation times were not significantly different. The percentage of agreement ranged from 46.1% to 94.2% depending on the item, and the quadratic-weighted kappas ranged from 0.43 to 0.92. Eight categories (26.6%) showed a weighted kappa exceeding 0.4, 11 others (36.7%) exceeded 0.6, and another 11 (36.7%) produced kappas of more than 0.8. Conclusion: Either a single rater or a team of raters can produce valid and consistent ratings when using the Chinese version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Rehabilitation Set to assess patients in a rehabilitation department. The team rating approach is suitable for clinical application.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1651-2081
1650-1977
1651-2081
DOI:10.2340/jrm.v55.14737