Ten years after Copenhagen: Reimagining climate change governance in urban areas

In this review, we take stock of the last decade of research on climate change governance in urban areas since the 2009 conference in Copenhagen. Using a systematic evaluation of academic publications in the field, we argue that the current moment of research has been shaped by two recent waves of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change Vol. 11; no. 4
Main Authors Castán Broto, Vanesa, Westman, Linda K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1757-7780
1757-7799
DOI10.1002/wcc.643

Cover

More Information
Summary:In this review, we take stock of the last decade of research on climate change governance in urban areas since the 2009 conference in Copenhagen. Using a systematic evaluation of academic publications in the field, we argue that the current moment of research has been shaped by two recent waves of thought. The first, a wave of urban optimism, which started in 2011 and peaked in 2013, engaged with urban areas as alternative sites for governance in the face of the crumbling international climate regime. The second, a wave of urban pragmatism, which started in 2016, has sought to reimagine urban areas following the integration of the “sub‐national” as a meaningful category in the international climate regime after the 2015 Paris Agreement for Climate Action. Four themes dominate the debate on climate change governance in urban areas: why there is climate action, how climate action is delivered, how it is articulated in relation to internationally reaching networks, and what implications it has to understand environmental or climate justice within urban settings. Calls to understand the impacts of climate change policy have fostered research on climate change politics, issues of power and control, conflicts, and the inherently unjust nature of much climate policy. What is largely missing from the current scholarship is a sober assessment of the mundane aspects of climate change governance on the ground and a concern with what kind of cultural and socio‐economic change is taking place, beyond comparative analyses of the effectiveness of climate policies. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Governing Climate Change in Communities, Cities, and Regions We are moving towards a wave of urban pragmatism in climate change and cities research.
Bibliography:Funding information
H2020 European Research Council, Grant/Award Number: 804051‐LO‐ACT‐ERC‐2018‐STG
ISSN:1757-7780
1757-7799
DOI:10.1002/wcc.643