Comparison of Econometric Models and Artificial Neural Networks Algorithms for the Prediction of Baltic Dry Index

The shipping market, a major component of the global economy, is characterized by high risk and volatility. The Baltic dry index is an influential indicator in the world shipping market and international trade. Several studies have used a variety of techniques to generate Baltic dry index prediction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE access Vol. 7; pp. 1647 - 1657
Main Authors Zhang, Xin, Xue, Tianyuan, Eugene Stanley, H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 2019
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884877

Cover

More Information
Summary:The shipping market, a major component of the global economy, is characterized by high risk and volatility. The Baltic dry index is an influential indicator in the world shipping market and international trade. Several studies have used a variety of techniques to generate Baltic dry index predictions. The most prominent techniques utilize either econometric or artificial intelligence computing. We compare the forecasting accuracy of two typical univariant econometric models and three artificial neural networks (ANNs)-based algorithms. We find that when using daily data, econometric forecasting models produce better one-step-ahead predictions than ANN-based algorithms. When forecasting weekly and monthly data, ANN-based algorithms produce fewer errors and a higher direction matching rate than econometric models. We also compare the predictive power of a number of different models when applied to the 2008 financial crisis and find that the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity model and the back propagation neural network algorithm produce the best one-step-ahead and seven-steps ahead predictions, respectively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2884877