Fault Diagnosis Based on Machine Learning for the High Frequency Link of a Grid-Tied Photovoltaic Converter for a Wide Range of Irradiance Conditions

The objective of this work is to select a Machine Learning Technique (MLT) to develop a fault diagnosis scheme for the power switching devices of the High Frequency link (HF link) in a grid-tied Photovoltaic (PV) system, without increasing the total number of sensors, and being capable to operate on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE access Vol. 9; pp. 151209 - 151220
Main Authors Leon-Ruiz, Yuniel, Gonzalez-Garcia, Mario, Alvarez-Salas, Ricardo, Cuevas-Tello, Juan, Cardenas, Victor
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3126706

Cover

More Information
Summary:The objective of this work is to select a Machine Learning Technique (MLT) to develop a fault diagnosis scheme for the power switching devices of the High Frequency link (HF link) in a grid-tied Photovoltaic (PV) system, without increasing the total number of sensors, and being capable to operate online. Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Probabilistic Neural Network (PNN) and Naive Bayes (NB) algorithms are considered to solve the problem of fault classification. These four MLTs are compared using the specificity and sensitivity indexes. The inputs of the models are obtained from the mean value of the signals given by the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) of the dc link voltage and the power extracted from the PV panels. Support vector machine algorithm is chosen as the most suitable classifier to diagnose single and simultaneous open circuit faults with lower computational effort. Simulation and real-time hardware-based experimental tests demonstrate that the MLTs are suitable and reliable to diagnose open circuit faults in a wide range of irradiance levels, ranging from 200 W/m 2 to 1000 W/m 2 , even under 6 % and 12 % measurement errors, without increasing the overall system cost.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:2169-3536
2169-3536
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3126706