Predicting Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: Clinical Application of the ECG-Derived QRS-T Angle

BACKGROUND—In patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), the incidence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias resulting in ICD therapy is relatively low, prompting for better risk stratification. The aim of this study was to assess the value of the QRS-T an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Vol. 2; no. 5; pp. 548 - 554
Main Authors Borleffs, C Jan Willem, Scherptong, Roderick W.C., Man, Sum-Che, van Welsenes, Guido H., Bax, Jeroen J., van Erven, Lieselot, Swenne, Cees A., Schalij, Martin J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD American Heart Association, Inc 01.10.2009
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1941-3149
1941-3084
1941-3084
DOI10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859108

Cover

More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND—In patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), the incidence of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias resulting in ICD therapy is relatively low, prompting for better risk stratification. The aim of this study was to assess the value of the QRS-T angle for prediction of ICD therapy and mortality in primary prevention patients with ischemic heart disease. METHODS AND RESULTS—ICD patients (n=412, 361 men; age, 63±11 years) with ischemic heart disease and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% were included. After device implantation, the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy and mortality was noted. A survival analysis was performed comparing patients with a planar QRS-T angle ≤90° (n=124, 30%) with patients with a planar QRS-T angle >90° before device implantation. Furthermore, patients with a spatial QRS-T angle ≤100° (n=56, 14%) were compared with patients with a spatial QRS-T angle >100°, before implantation. For patients with a planar QRS-T angle >90° as compared with ≤90°, the adjusted hazard ratio for the occurrence of appropriate device therapy was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1 to 5.2); a spatial QRS-T angle >100° was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 7.3 (95% CI, 1.0 to 53.8). Furthermore, a spatial QRS-T angle ≤100° exhibited a positive predictive value of 98% (95% CI, 95 to 100) for the prediction of an appropriate therapy-free follow-up. CONCLUSIONS—A wide QRS-T angle is a strong predictor of appropriate device therapy in primary prevention ICD recipients with ischemic heart disease. Furthermore, a spatial QRS-T angle ≤100° might be of value in the identification of patients in whom, although currently indicated, ICD treatment should be reconsidered.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1941-3149
1941-3084
1941-3084
DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859108