Classification of Interbeat Interval Time-Series Using Attention Entropy

Classification of interbeat interval time-series which fluctuates in an irregular and complex manner is very challenging. Typically, entropy methods are employed to quantify the complexity of the time-series for classifying. Traditional entropy methods focus on the frequency distribution of all the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on affective computing Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 321 - 330
Main Authors Yang, Jiawei, Choudhary, Gulraiz I., Rahardja, Susanto, Franti, Pasi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway IEEE 01.01.2023
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1949-3045
1949-3045
DOI10.1109/TAFFC.2020.3031004

Cover

More Information
Summary:Classification of interbeat interval time-series which fluctuates in an irregular and complex manner is very challenging. Typically, entropy methods are employed to quantify the complexity of the time-series for classifying. Traditional entropy methods focus on the frequency distribution of all the observations in a time-series. This requires a relatively long time-series with at least a couple of thousands of data points, which limits their usages in practical applications. The methods are also sensitive to the parameter settings. In this paper, we propose a conceptually new approach called attention entropy , which pays attention only to the key observations. Instead of counting the frequency of all observations, it analyzes the frequency distribution of the intervals between the key observations in a time-series. Attention entropy does not need any parameter to tune, it is robust to the time-series length, and requires only linear time to compute. Experiments show that it outperforms fourteen state-of-the-art entropy methods evaluated by real-world datasets. It achieves average classification accuracy of AUC = 0.71 while the second-best method, multiscale entropy, achieves AUC = 0.62 when classifying four groups of people with a time-series length of 100.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1949-3045
1949-3045
DOI:10.1109/TAFFC.2020.3031004