Ground Reaction Force Calcaneal Offset: A new measurement of hindfoot alignment

The tibio-calcaneal angle (TCA) does not measure individual forefoot contributions to the overall foot balance. Using standard radiographs we calculated the ideal hindfoot alignment based on ground reaction force (GRF), independently from the tibial axis. Thirty-six patients (40ft.) were included. M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFoot and ankle surgery Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 9 - 14
Main Authors Lintz, Francois, Barton, Tristan, Millet, Mark, Harries, William J., Hepple, Stephen, Winson, Ian G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published France Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1268-7731
1460-9584
1460-9584
DOI10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.003

Cover

More Information
Summary:The tibio-calcaneal angle (TCA) does not measure individual forefoot contributions to the overall foot balance. Using standard radiographs we calculated the ideal hindfoot alignment based on ground reaction force (GRF), independently from the tibial axis. Thirty-six patients (40ft.) were included. Mean age was 56. Weight bearing radiographs were taken. Calcaneal offsets were measured using tibio-calcaneal angles and GRF algorithms. Measurements were compared using the Bland–Altman method. Both methods agreed (p>0.05) but individual discrepancies were found. Mean measured offsets were −11.5mm (SD: 10.2) using TCA and −8mm (SD: 9.3) using GRF. Mean bias between the methods was −0.88mm. The GRF algorithm successfully measured hindfoot alignment. The absence of a previous gold standard and radiographic variability are a limit. The TCA underestimated calcaneal offset. Discrepancies showed that forefoot position data provided increased accuracy. This could be of particular relevance for surgical planning.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1268-7731
1460-9584
1460-9584
DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2011.01.003