Reduction of Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Dual-Chamber ICDs

Background: Unnecessary right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) may adversely affect heart failure morbidity and total mortality. Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs (INTRINSIC RV) is a prospective, multicenter, r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPacing and clinical electrophysiology Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 237 - 243
Main Authors OLSHANSKY, BRIAN, DAY, JOHN, McGUIRE, MAUREEN, HAHN, STEPHEN, BROWN, SCOTT, LEREW, DARIN R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148-5018 , USA and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , UK Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.03.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00329.x

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background: Unnecessary right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) may adversely affect heart failure morbidity and total mortality. Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing with AV Search Hysteresis in ICDs (INTRINSIC RV) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating outcomes in ICD recipients programmed to single‐chamber pacing (VVI) versus dual‐chamber (DDDR) pacing with AV search hysteresis (AVSH). Methods: Patients underwent ICD implant (for standard indications). The ICD was programmed to DDDR with AVSH regardless of any need for pacing. Rate‐adaptive pacing was set at 60–130 ppm with dynamic AV delay from 200 to 90 ms. AVSH was programmed to search every 32 intervals and extend the AV delay by 50%. One week post‐implant patients with ICDs were interrogated to assess the percentage of RV pacing with the expectation that most would have <20% RV pacing and would be randomized into INTRINSIC RV. Early analysis showed that targets for randomization were not met. AVSH parameters were modified under a protocol amendment to increase AV delay extension to 100%. We report findings related to this programming change based upon analyses of (nonrandomized) data pre‐ and post‐amendment. Results: Twenty‐one percent of patients (n = 314) were enrolled pre‐amendment and 79% (n = 1,216) were enrolled post‐amendment. The mean percentage of RV pacing at the 1‐week visit was 41.4 ± 29.6% pre‐amendment and 14.7 ± 22.6% post‐amendment (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients eligible for randomization (RV pacing <20% at the 1‐week visit) was 31.2% pre‐amendment and 76.8% post‐amendment (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: AVSH can dramatically reduce the percentage of RV pacing among ICD recipients.
Bibliography:istex:069F116C1E35BF6C6F0B3D5707E6FBCFA4386BF7
ArticleID:PACE329
ark:/67375/WNG-TN4B1776-K
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00329.x