A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE ON CLIMATE MODEL EVALUATION FOR ANTARCTICA
[...]the observational data against which models are assessed is often limited in both time and space. [...]when assessing multidecadal projections of future change, model evaluation should include consideration of the following factors: i) expert judgment on whether important processes are represen...
Saved in:
| Published in | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 97; no. 2; pp. ES23 - ES26 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Boston
American Meteorological Society
01.02.2016
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0003-0007 1520-0477 1520-0477 |
| DOI | 10.1175/bams-d-15-00108.1 |
Cover
| Summary: | [...]the observational data against which models are assessed is often limited in both time and space. [...]when assessing multidecadal projections of future change, model evaluation should include consideration of the following factors: i) expert judgment on whether important processes are represented correctly in the model in question, ii) appropriate measures of skill relative to observations, and iii) how measures of skill may relate to the reliability of the projections. [...]it is recommended that model evaluation should incorporate both the modern instrumental period and key time slices in the past (e.g., Pliocene, last interglacial, last glacial-interglacial transition, and the Holocene). |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 |
| ISSN: | 0003-0007 1520-0477 1520-0477 |
| DOI: | 10.1175/bams-d-15-00108.1 |