A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE ON CLIMATE MODEL EVALUATION FOR ANTARCTICA

[...]the observational data against which models are assessed is often limited in both time and space. [...]when assessing multidecadal projections of future change, model evaluation should include consideration of the following factors: i) expert judgment on whether important processes are represen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 97; no. 2; pp. ES23 - ES26
Main Authors Bracegirdle, T. J., Bertler, N. A. N., Carleton, A. M., Ding, Q., Fogwill, C. J., Fyfe, J. C., Hellmer, H. H., Karpechko, A. Y., Kusahara, K., Larour, E., Mayewski, P. A., Meier, W. N., Polvani, L. M., Russell, J. L., Stevenson, S. L., Turner, J., van Wessem, J. M., van de Berg, W. J., Wainer, I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston American Meteorological Society 01.02.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0003-0007
1520-0477
1520-0477
DOI10.1175/bams-d-15-00108.1

Cover

More Information
Summary:[...]the observational data against which models are assessed is often limited in both time and space. [...]when assessing multidecadal projections of future change, model evaluation should include consideration of the following factors: i) expert judgment on whether important processes are represented correctly in the model in question, ii) appropriate measures of skill relative to observations, and iii) how measures of skill may relate to the reliability of the projections. [...]it is recommended that model evaluation should incorporate both the modern instrumental period and key time slices in the past (e.g., Pliocene, last interglacial, last glacial-interglacial transition, and the Holocene).
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0003-0007
1520-0477
1520-0477
DOI:10.1175/bams-d-15-00108.1