Using only cross-document relationships for both generic and topic-focused multi-document summarizations

In recent years graph-ranking based algorithms have been proposed for single document summarization and generic multi-document summarization. The algorithms make use of the “votings” or “recommendations” between sentences to evaluate the importance of the sentences in the documents. This study aims...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInformation retrieval (Boston) Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 25 - 49
Main Author Wan, Xiaojun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.02.2008
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1386-4564
1573-7659
DOI10.1007/s10791-007-9037-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:In recent years graph-ranking based algorithms have been proposed for single document summarization and generic multi-document summarization. The algorithms make use of the “votings” or “recommendations” between sentences to evaluate the importance of the sentences in the documents. This study aims to differentiate the cross-document and within-document relationships between sentences for generic multi-document summarization and adapt the graph-ranking based algorithm for topic-focused summarization. The contributions of this study are two-fold: (1) For generic multi-document summarization, we apply the graph-based ranking algorithm based on each kind of sentence relationship and explore their relative importance for summarization performance. (2) For topic-focused multi-document summarization, we propose to integrate the relevance of the sentences to the specified topic into the graph-ranking based method. Each individual kind of sentence relationship is also differentiated and investigated in the algorithm. Experimental results on DUC 2002–DUC 2005 data demonstrate the great importance of the cross-document relationships between sentences for both generic and topic-focused multi-document summarizations. Even the approach based only on the cross-document relationships can perform better than or at least as well as the approaches based on both kinds of relationships between sentences.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1386-4564
1573-7659
DOI:10.1007/s10791-007-9037-5