The neonatal mortality risk of vulnerable newborns in rural Bangladesh: A prospective cohort study within the Shonjibon trial

Objectives Preterm birth (<37 weeks), low birth weight (2500 g), small‐for‐gestational‐age (birth weight <10th percentile of a given reference), and large‐for‐gestational‐age (birth weight >90th percentile of a given reference) are indicators of vulnerable infants and risk factors for neona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTropical medicine & international health Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 283 - 291
Main Authors Hewish, Alexandra, Dibley, Michael J., Raihana, Shahreen, Rahman, Mohammad Masudur, Islam, Sajia, Arifeen, Shams, Huda, Tanvir
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2025
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1360-2276
1365-3156
1365-3156
DOI10.1111/tmi.14092

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objectives Preterm birth (<37 weeks), low birth weight (2500 g), small‐for‐gestational‐age (birth weight <10th percentile of a given reference), and large‐for‐gestational‐age (birth weight >90th percentile of a given reference) are indicators of vulnerable infants and risk factors for neonatal mortality. We estimated the prevalence and risk of neonatal mortality associated with these phenotypes and their mutually exclusive phenotypes in rural Bangladesh. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in five rural districts of Bangladesh using data collected from births in the Shonjibon Trial from 2013 to 2015. We estimated the prevalence of preterm birth, low birth weight, small‐for‐gestational‐age, and large‐for‐gestational‐age infants, individually and for mutually exclusive phenotypes, using a combination of these phenotypes. Neonatal mortality associated with preterm birth, low birth weight, small‐for‐gestational‐age, large‐for‐gestational‐age, and mutually exclusive phenotypes were calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Poisson regression for adjusted relative risks (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We included 24,314 live births in this study. The prevalence of preterm birth, low birth weight, small‐for‐gestational‐age, and large‐for‐gestational‐age was 26.2%, 22.9%, 41.7%, and 8.2%, respectively. The prevalence of babies born appropriate for gestational age, with term gestation (≥37 weeks) and normal birth weight (≥2500 g) was 33.3%. For individual phenotypes, the neonatal mortality risk was approximately 3‐fold for preterm, low birth weight, and large‐for‐gestational‐age newborns and 1.5‐fold for small‐for‐gestational‐age newborns compared with appropriate‐for‐gestational‐age, term, and normal birth weight newborns. The risk of neonatal mortality for mutually exclusive phenotypes was highest in small‐for‐gestational‐age, preterm, and low birth weight newborns (aRR = 6.3, 95% CI 4.1–9.6) relative to appropriate for gestational age, term, and normal birth weight newborns. Conclusions In rural Bangladesh, most infants are born with one or more vulnerable phenotypes associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality. Our findings highlight the value of categorising newborns using mutually exclusive vulnerable phenotypes and their neonatal mortality risks, which can be used to tailor interventions to improve survival.
Bibliography:Sustainable Development Goal
Good Health and Wellbeing
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Sustainable Development Goal: Good Health and Wellbeing
ISSN:1360-2276
1365-3156
1365-3156
DOI:10.1111/tmi.14092