Meta-analysis of blinded and unblinded studies for ongoing aggregate safety monitoring and evaluation

• Published in: Contemporary clinical trials Vol. 95; p. 106068
• Main Authors: Lin, Li-An, Yuan, Shuai Sammy, Li, Lie, Ball, Greg
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2020
• Subjects: Blinded analysis; Evidence synthesis; Meta analysis; Safety monitoring and evaluation; Unblinded analysis; Safety monitoring and evaluation; Blinded analysis; Meta analysis; Unblinded analysis; Evidence synthesis
• ISSN: 1551-7144; 1559-2030; 1559-2030
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106068

During the course of clinical development, ongoing aggregate safety monitoring and evaluation are needed to understand the evolving safety profile and to ensure effective risk-management strategies for medicinal products. CIOMS reports and global regulatory guidance (including from ICH, US FDA, and EMA) compel sponsors for assessment of safety based on aggregate data. To identify and characterize the risks of medicinal products at a program level in a more timely and informed manner, aggregate safety evaluations should combine all available information, including from ongoing blinded trials, completed unblinded trials, and other data sources. In this article, we propose two Bayesian meta-analytic approaches for synthesizing blinded and unblinded studies in order to characterize the evolving safety profile of medicinal products at the program level. With the proposed approaches, sponsors can dynamically update knowledge of their product safety profiles as data accrue. Application of the procedures to a real and a hypothetical clinical trial program are provided to illustrate how the proposed approaches can be used to analyze a pre-specified event of interest and to screen for risk-elevated events.