Neuroprotection of Erythropoietin and Methylprednisolone against Spinal Cord Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Recent research based on various animal models has shown the neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin (EPO). However, few studies have examined such effects of EPO in the clinic. In this study we enrolled patients with spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury to investigate the clinical applic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences Vol. 31; no. 5; pp. 652 - 656
Main Author 熊敏 陈森 余化龙 刘志刚 曾云 李锋
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Huazhong University of Science and Technology 01.10.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1672-0733
1993-1352
DOI10.1007/s11596-011-0576-z

Cover

More Information
Summary:Recent research based on various animal models has shown the neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin (EPO). However, few studies have examined such effects of EPO in the clinic. In this study we enrolled patients with spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury to investigate the clinical application of EPO and methylprednisolone (MP) for the neuroprotection against spinal cord I-R injury. Retrospective analysis of 63 cases of spinal cord I-R injury was performed. The Frankel neurological performance scale was used to evaluate the neurological function after spinal cord injury (SCI), including 12 cases of scale B, 30 cases of scale C, and 21 cases of scale D. These cases were divided into 2 groups: group A (27 cases) got treatment with both EPO and MP; group B (36 cases) got treatment with MP only. The neurological function of patients after treatment was evaluated by American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) index score, and activity of daily living (ADL) of the patients was also recorded. All patients got follow-up and the follow-up period ranged from 24 to 39 months (mean 26 months). There was no significance difference in neurological function between groups A and B before the treatment (P〉0.05). However, the neurological function and ADL scores were significantly improved 1 week, 1 year or 2 years after the treatment compared to those before the treatment (P〈0.05), and the improvement was more significant in group A than in group B (P〈0.05). It is suggested that the clinical application of EPO and MP provides the neuroprotection against spinal cord I-R injury.
Bibliography:erythropoietin methylprednisolone neuroprotection spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion in-jury
Recent research based on various animal models has shown the neuroprotective effects of erythropoietin (EPO). However, few studies have examined such effects of EPO in the clinic. In this study we enrolled patients with spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury to investigate the clinical application of EPO and methylprednisolone (MP) for the neuroprotection against spinal cord I-R injury. Retrospective analysis of 63 cases of spinal cord I-R injury was performed. The Frankel neurological performance scale was used to evaluate the neurological function after spinal cord injury (SCI), including 12 cases of scale B, 30 cases of scale C, and 21 cases of scale D. These cases were divided into 2 groups: group A (27 cases) got treatment with both EPO and MP; group B (36 cases) got treatment with MP only. The neurological function of patients after treatment was evaluated by American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) index score, and activity of daily living (ADL) of the patients was also recorded. All patients got follow-up and the follow-up period ranged from 24 to 39 months (mean 26 months). There was no significance difference in neurological function between groups A and B before the treatment (P〉0.05). However, the neurological function and ADL scores were significantly improved 1 week, 1 year or 2 years after the treatment compared to those before the treatment (P〈0.05), and the improvement was more significant in group A than in group B (P〈0.05). It is suggested that the clinical application of EPO and MP provides the neuroprotection against spinal cord I-R injury.
42-1679/R
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1672-0733
1993-1352
DOI:10.1007/s11596-011-0576-z