Hybrid projection-reflection method for phase retrieval
The phase-retrieval problem, fundamental in applied physics and engineering, addresses the question of how to determine the phase of a complex-valued function from modulus data and additional a priori information. Recently we identified two important methods for phase retrieval, namely, Fienup'...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision Vol. 20; no. 6; p. 1025 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        United States
        
        01.06.2003
     | 
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 1084-7529 1520-8532  | 
| DOI | 10.1364/josaa.20.001025 | 
Cover
| Summary: | The phase-retrieval problem, fundamental in applied physics and engineering, addresses the question of how to determine the phase of a complex-valued function from modulus data and additional a priori information. Recently we identified two important methods for phase retrieval, namely, Fienup's basic input-output and hybrid input-output (HIO) algorithms, with classical convex projection methods and suggested that further connections between convex optimization and phase retrieval should be explored. Following up on this work, we introduce a new projection-based method, termed the hybrid projection-reflection (HPR) algorithm, for solving phase-retrieval problems featuring nonnegativity constraints in the object domain. Motivated by properties of the HPR algorithm for convex constraints, we recommend an error measure studied by Fienup more than 20 years ago. This error measure, which has received little attention in the literature, lends itself to an easily implementable stopping criterion. In numerical experiments we found the HPR algorithm to be a competitive alternative to the HIO algorithm and the stopping criterion to be reliable and robust. | 
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1084-7529 1520-8532  | 
| DOI: | 10.1364/josaa.20.001025 |