Ten Things You Might Not Know about Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Amid mounting concerns about nephrogenic sclerosis and gadolinium deposition in the brain, physicians and patients alike are starting to question the use of gadolinium chelates for clinical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The search for safer alternatives is currently underway. In North America, th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiology Vol. 284; no. 3; pp. 616 - 629
Main Author Daldrup-Link, Heike E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Radiological Society of North America 01.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0033-8419
1527-1315
1527-1315
DOI10.1148/radiol.2017162759

Cover

More Information
Summary:Amid mounting concerns about nephrogenic sclerosis and gadolinium deposition in the brain, physicians and patients alike are starting to question the use of gadolinium chelates for clinical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The search for safer alternatives is currently underway. In North America, the iron supplement ferumoxytol has gained considerable interest as an MR contrast agent. In Europe, ferumoxtran-10 is entering phase III clinical trials. As these agents are starting to be used by a new generation of radiologists, important clinical questions have re-emerged, including those that have been answered in the past. This article offers 10 important insights for the use of iron oxide nanoparticles in clinical MR imaging.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0033-8419
1527-1315
1527-1315
DOI:10.1148/radiol.2017162759