Ten Things You Might Not Know about Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
Amid mounting concerns about nephrogenic sclerosis and gadolinium deposition in the brain, physicians and patients alike are starting to question the use of gadolinium chelates for clinical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The search for safer alternatives is currently underway. In North America, th...
Saved in:
Published in | Radiology Vol. 284; no. 3; pp. 616 - 629 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Radiological Society of North America
01.09.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0033-8419 1527-1315 1527-1315 |
DOI | 10.1148/radiol.2017162759 |
Cover
Summary: | Amid mounting concerns about nephrogenic sclerosis and gadolinium deposition in the brain, physicians and patients alike are starting to question the use of gadolinium chelates for clinical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The search for safer alternatives is currently underway. In North America, the iron supplement ferumoxytol has gained considerable interest as an MR contrast agent. In Europe, ferumoxtran-10 is entering phase III clinical trials. As these agents are starting to be used by a new generation of radiologists, important clinical questions have re-emerged, including those that have been answered in the past. This article offers 10 important insights for the use of iron oxide nanoparticles in clinical MR imaging. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0033-8419 1527-1315 1527-1315 |
DOI: | 10.1148/radiol.2017162759 |