Comparing mortality risk reduction, life expectancy gains, and probability of achieving full life span, as alternatives for presenting CVD mortality risk reduction: A discrete choice study of framing risk and health behaviour change

The growing rate of obesity has recently required governments to divert considerable resources in the promotion of healthy lifestyles. We explored the relative effectiveness in inducing healthy behaviour change of three different communication strategies about the benefits of an intervention that re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial science & medicine (1982) Vol. 211; pp. 164 - 174
Main Authors Grisolía, José M., Longo, Alberto, Hutchinson, George, Kee, Frank
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.08.2018
Pergamon Press Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0277-9536
1873-5347
1873-5347
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.011

Cover

More Information
Summary:The growing rate of obesity has recently required governments to divert considerable resources in the promotion of healthy lifestyles. We explored the relative effectiveness in inducing healthy behaviour change of three different communication strategies about the benefits of an intervention that reduces the mortality risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and encourages respondents to embrace healthier lifestyles. We designed a Discrete Choice Experiments questionnaire to analyse the trade-off between lifestyles, defined in terms of diet and exercise, and reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk. We set three ways of framing an identical benefit: (A) as a reduction in mortality risk from cardiovascular disease, (B) as an increase in months of life expectancy, and (C) as an increase in the probability of reaching an individual's full lifespan. The experiment was tailored for each subject in the sample according to his/her individual's baseline information on diet and physical activity. During the period February 2010–July 2011, we interviewed 1008 individuals in Northern Ireland, split randomly into three samples for the three CVD risk reduction frames. Considering the models' goodness of fit and significance, we conclude that the most effective way of communicating these CVD health benefits is using an increase in life expectancy, since with this frame individuals are more inclined to state that they would change to a healthier lifestyle. •We compared three ways of framing an identical benefit in a Stated Preference task.•The value of an extra year of life was estimated to be 63,024 GBP.•We estimated the VSL in 814,777 GBP.•Expressing benefits in terms of life expectancy gains was most persuasive.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-9536
1873-5347
1873-5347
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.011