Social value at a distance: Higher identification with all of humanity is associated with reduced social discounting

• Published in: Cognition Vol. 230; p. 105283
• Main Authors: Tuen, Young Ji, Bulley, Adam, Palombo, Daniela J., O'Connor, Brendan Bo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.01.2023; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Decision making; Delay discounting; Discounting; Equality; Humans; Identity; Judgment; Morality; Pandemics; Psychological mechanisms; Psychological processes; Public goods; Reward; Social discounting; Social distance; Social networks; Social organization; Social Values; Welfare; Social discounting; Morality; Delay discounting; Equality; Identity
• ISSN: 0010-0277; 1873-7838; 1873-7838
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105283

How much we value the welfare of others has critical implications for the collective good. Yet, it is unclear what leads people to make more or less equal decisions about the welfare of those from whom they are socially distant. The current research sought to explore the psychological mechanisms that might underlie welfare judgements across social distance. Here, a social discounting paradigm was used to measure the tendency for the value of a reward to be discounted as the social distance of its recipient increased. Across two cohorts (one discovery, one replication), we found that a more expansive identity with all of humanity was associated with reduced social discounting. Additionally, we investigated the specificity of this association by examining whether this relationship extended to delay discounting, the tendency for the value of a reward to be discounted as the temporal distance to its receipt increases. Our findings suggest that the observed association with identity was unique to social discounting, thus underscoring a distinction in value-based decision-making processes across distances in time and across social networks. As data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, we also considered how stress associated with this global threat might influence welfare judgements across social distances. We found that, even after controlling for COVID-19 related stress, correlations between identity and social discounting held. Together, these findings elucidate the psychological processes that are associated with a more equal distribution of generosity.