Comparison of right ventricular volume measurement between segmented k-space gradient-echo and steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging

Purpose To compare right ventricular volume measurements and their reproducibility between steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and conventional turbo gradient‐echo (TGE) imaging. Materials and Methods Right ventricular volumes and observer variabilities were compared between SSFP and TGE in 31 subje...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 253 - 258
Main Authors Alfakih, Khaled, Thiele, Holger, Plein, Sven, Bainbridge, Gavin J., Ridgway, John P., Sivananthan, Mohan U.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.09.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI10.1002/jmri.10164

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose To compare right ventricular volume measurements and their reproducibility between steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and conventional turbo gradient‐echo (TGE) imaging. Materials and Methods Right ventricular volumes and observer variabilities were compared between SSFP and TGE in 31 subjects (21 normal volunteers and 10 subjects with heart failure). For further internal validation of the right ventricular volumes, the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) stroke volumes were compared for the normal volunteers. Results The volumes as measured by SSFP were significantly larger than for TGE (mean bias end‐diastolic volume [EDV] 11.1 ± 14.2, end‐systolic volume [ESV] 9.8 ± 9.75). SSFP had lower interobserver variability (SSFP EDV −10.1 ± 11.6 vs. TGE EDV −6.2 ± 18.5) and intra‐observer variability (SSFP EDV −2.0 ± 6.3 vs. TGE EDV −6.1 ± 14.8). The mean absolute differences between LV and RV stroke volumes for 21 normal volunteers were: TGE 5.8 ± 12.9 (r2 = 0.72), SSFP 4.6 ± 6.9 (r2 = 0.92). Conclusion SSFP and TGE yield different measurement values of RV volumes with SSFP, providing a more reproducible measurement. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;16:253–258. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:British Heart Foundation
istex:D94407D1066A3F03C1F19BBF67B849E8BCDE0C05
ArticleID:JMRI10164
ark:/67375/WNG-WSMF7CFG-X
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.10164