A comparison of different input devices for a 3D environment

This paper presents a usability study comparing wand, voice, and two tablet-PC based interfaces across a task requiring three-dimensional surface exploration, information gathering and recall of information. The aim of this study was to identify a suitable interaction interface, among the ones imple...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of industrial ergonomics Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 554 - 563
Main Authors Dang, Nguyen Thong, Tavanti, Monica, Rankin, Ivan, Cooper, Matthew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.05.2009
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0169-8141
1872-8219
DOI10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.016

Cover

More Information
Summary:This paper presents a usability study comparing wand, voice, and two tablet-PC based interfaces across a task requiring three-dimensional surface exploration, information gathering and recall of information. The aim of this study was to identify a suitable interaction interface, among the ones implemented in a three-dimensional environment for Air Traffic Control, for interactive exploration of and gathering information about three-dimensional weather structures. Data concerning time, error rate, number of control actions as well as participants’ feedback on ease of learning, ease of use, frustration and perceived difficulty of the performed task were collected. The results indicate that the wand interface supported better performance when compared with the other interaction interfaces. Among the four interaction interfaces, the voice interface seems to present several limitations, mostly related to time lag in the voice recognition, which was judged by the subjects as a source of frustration.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-8141
1872-8219
DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.016