Continental risk assessment for understudied taxa post‐catastrophic wildfire indicates severe impacts on the Australian bee fauna

• Published in: Global change biology Vol. 27; no. 24; pp. 6551 - 6567
• Main Authors: Dorey, James B., Rebola, Celina M., Davies, Olivia K., Prendergast, Kit S., Parslow, Ben A., Hogendoorn, Katja, Leijs, Remko, Hearn, Lucas R., Leitch, Emrys J., O’Reilly, Robert L., Marsh, Jessica, Woinarski, John C. Z., Caddy‐Retalic, Stefan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2021
• Subjects: Bees; Biodiversity; bushfire; Catastrophic events; climate change; data collection; Disaster management; disturbance; Ecological effects; Endangered & extinct species; Endangered species; extinction; extinction risk; fauna; Geographical information systems; global change; Indigenous species; invertebrates; life history; Meta-analysis; Population number; population size; Rare species; risk; Risk assessment; Species checklists; Species extinction; Surveys; Taxa; Threatened species; Wildfires
• ISSN: 1354-1013; 1365-2486; 1365-2486
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15879

The 2019–2020 Australian Black Summer wildfires demonstrated that single events can have widespread and catastrophic impacts on biodiversity, causing a sudden and marked reduction in population size for many species. In such circumstances, there is a need for conservation managers to respond rapidly to implement priority remedial management actions for the most‐affected species to help prevent extinctions. To date, priority responses have been biased towards high‐profile taxa with substantial information bases. Here, we demonstrate that sufficient data are available to model the extinction risk for many less well‐known species, which could inform much broader and more effective ecological disaster responses. Using publicly available collection and GIS datasets, combined with life‐history data, we modelled the extinction risk from the 2019–2020 catastrophic Australian wildfires for 553 Australian native bee species (33% of all described Australian bee taxa). We suggest that two species are now eligible for listing as Endangered and nine are eligible for listing as Vulnerable under IUCN criteria, on the basis of fire overlap, intensity, frequency, and life‐history traits: this tally far exceeds the three Australian bee species listed as threatened prior to the wildfire. We demonstrate how to undertake a wide‐scale assessment of wildfire impact on a poorly understood group to help to focus surveys and recovery efforts. We also provide the methods and the script required to make similar assessments for other taxa or in other regions. The novel methods, outcomes, and implications are from analyses of the Black Summer wildfires on Australia's native bees. IUCN and EPBC categories are (L) Least Concern, (V) Vulnerable, (E) Endangered, and (CE) Critically Endangered. Silhouettes were either sourced from www.phylopic.org or created by the authors.