Application and Performance of CT-Fractional Flow Reserve in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

•The performance of CT-fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has not been previously evaluated in patients presenting with low-moderate risk NSTEMI.•In this study, CT-FFR provided additive diagnostic accuracy to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and demonstrated good correlation with invasi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of cardiology Vol. 247; pp. 6 - 12
Main Authors Warren, Josephine, Dawson, Luke, McCollom, Tori, Hudson, Lauren, Dagan, Misha, Zia, Adil, Kavnoudias, Helen, Lew, Philip, Shaw, James, Stub, Dion, Taylor, Andrew J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 15.07.2025
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9149
1879-1913
1879-1913
DOI10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.03.019

Cover

More Information
Summary:•The performance of CT-fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) has not been previously evaluated in patients presenting with low-moderate risk NSTEMI.•In this study, CT-FFR provided additive diagnostic accuracy to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and demonstrated good correlation with invasive FFR.•CT-FFR may be a suitable gatekeeper to ICA in low-intermediate risk NSTEMI patients, especially in regional or remote settings.•Larger, multi-center studies are required to validate the use of CT-FFR in patients with NSTEMI. Only half of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). A non-invasive test that can safely rule out obstructive CAD therefore warrants investigation. Computed tomography fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) enables hemodynamic interrogation of lesions identified on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) but it has not been evaluated in NSTEMI. Inpatients with NSTEMI were recruited to undergo CCTA with CT-FFR prior to ICA. Blinded CT-FFR was performed using Siemens Frontiers cFFR, version 1.4. Invasive FFR was performed on all intermediate lesions with stenoses measuring >30% to <90%. The performance of CT-FFR and CTCA was compared to the gold-standard of ICA plus FFR. Forty patients (131 vessels) were included. The mean age was 61 ± 11 years and 75% were male. CT-FFR showed good correlation with invasive FFR (r = 0.78) and exhibited excellent diagnostic accuracy for obstructive CAD (defined as FFR<0.80 or angiographic stenosis >90%) on a per-vessel analysis, with a sensitivity of 87%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value (PPV) 97%, negative predictive value (NPV) 95% and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) 0.93, which was superior to CCTA alone (sensitivity 82%, specificity 92%, PPV 82%, NPV 92%, AUC 0.87, p-value for AUC comparison = 0.04). On a per-patient analysis, CT-FFR had a diagnostic accuracy of 100%. In conclusion, CT-FFR provides additive diagnostic accuracy to CCTA in evaluating patients with NSTEMI and exhibits good correlation with invasive FFR.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.03.019