Mitigation of Ventilator-induced Diaphragm Atrophy by Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation

Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction is a significant contributor to weaning difficulty in ventilated critically ill patients. It has been hypothesized that electrically pacing the diaphragm during mechanical ventilation could reduce diaphragm dysfunction. We tested a novel, central line cathete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Vol. 195; no. 3; pp. 339 - 348
Main Authors Reynolds, Steven C., Meyyappan, Ramasamy, Thakkar, Viral, Tran, Bao D., Nolette, Marc-André, Sadarangani, Gautam, Sandoval, Rodrigo A., Bruulsema, Laura, Hannigan, Brett, Li, Jason W., Rohrs, Elizabeth, Zurba, Jason, Hoffer, Joaquín Andrés
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Thoracic Society 01.02.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1073-449X
1535-4970
DOI10.1164/rccm.201502-0363OC

Cover

More Information
Summary:Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction is a significant contributor to weaning difficulty in ventilated critically ill patients. It has been hypothesized that electrically pacing the diaphragm during mechanical ventilation could reduce diaphragm dysfunction. We tested a novel, central line catheter-based, transvenous phrenic nerve pacing therapy for protecting the diaphragm in sedated and ventilated pigs. Eighteen Yorkshire pigs were studied. Six pigs were sedated and mechanically ventilated for 2.5 days with pacing on alternate breaths at intensities that reduced the ventilator pressure-time product by 20-30%. Six matched subjects were similarly sedated and ventilated but were not paced. Six pigs served as never-ventilated, never-paced control animals. Cumulative duration of pacing therapy ranged from 19.7 to 35.7 hours. Diaphragm thickness assessed by ultrasound and normalized to initial value showed a significant decline in ventilated-not paced but not in ventilated-paced subjects (0.84 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.78-0.89] vs. 1.10 [IQR, 1.02-1.24]; P = 0.001). Compared with control animals (24.6 μm /kg; IQR, 21.6-26.0), median myofiber cross-sectional areas normalized to weight and sarcomere length were significantly smaller in the ventilated-not paced (17.9 μm /kg; IQR, 15.3-23.7; P = 0.005) but not in the ventilated-paced group (24.9 μm /kg; IQR, 16.6-27.3; P = 0.351). After 60 hours of mechanical ventilation all six ventilated-paced subjects tolerated 8 minutes of intense phrenic stimulation, whereas three of six ventilated-not paced subjects did not (P = 0.055). There was a nonsignificant decrease in diaphragm tetanic force production over the experiment in the ventilated-paced and ventilated-not paced groups. These results suggest that early transvenous phrenic nerve pacing may mitigate ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/rccm.201502-0363OC