Disease monitoring strategies in inflammatory bowel diseases: What do we mean by ‘tight control’?

In recent years, there has been a critical change in treatment paradigms in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) triggered by the arrival of new effective treatments aiming to prevent disease progression, bowel damage and disability. The insufficiency of symptomatic disease control and the well-known d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 25; no. 41; pp. 6172 - 6189
Main Authors Gonczi, Lorant, Bessissow, Talat, Lakatos, Peter Laszlo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 07.11.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1007-9327
2219-2840
2219-2840
DOI10.3748/wjg.v25.i41.6172

Cover

More Information
Summary:In recent years, there has been a critical change in treatment paradigms in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) triggered by the arrival of new effective treatments aiming to prevent disease progression, bowel damage and disability. The insufficiency of symptomatic disease control and the well-known discordance between symptoms and objective measures of disease activity lead to the need of reviewing conventional treatment algorithms and developing new concepts of optimal therapeutic strategy. The treat-to-target strategies, defined by the selecting therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease consensus recommendation, move away from only symptomatic disease control and support targeting composite therapeutic endpoints (clinical and endoscopical remission) and timely assessment. Emerging data suggest that early therapy using a treat-to-target approach and an algorithmic therapy escalation using regular disease monitoring by clinical and biochemical markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) leads to improved outcomes. This review aims to present the emerging strategies and supporting evidence in the current therapeutic paradigm of IBD including the concepts of "early intervention", "treat-to-target" and "tight control" strategies. We also discuss the real-word experience and applicability of these new strategies and give an overview on the future perspectives and areas in need of further research and potential improvement regarding treatment targets and ("tight") disease monitoring strategies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Author contributions: All authors equally contributed to this paper with conception and design of the study, literature review and analysis, drafting and critical revision and editing, and final approval of the final version; Bessissow T reviewed and language edited the submitted version of the manuscript.
Telephone: +1-514-9341934 Fax: +1-514-9344452
Corresponding author: Peter Laszlo Lakatos, DSc, FRCP (C), MD, Full Professor, Staff Physician, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal H3G 1A4, Quebec, Canada. peter.lakatos@mcgill.ca
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v25.i41.6172