Disease monitoring strategies in inflammatory bowel diseases: What do we mean by ‘tight control’?
In recent years, there has been a critical change in treatment paradigms in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) triggered by the arrival of new effective treatments aiming to prevent disease progression, bowel damage and disability. The insufficiency of symptomatic disease control and the well-known d...
Saved in:
| Published in | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 25; no. 41; pp. 6172 - 6189 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
07.11.2019
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1007-9327 2219-2840 2219-2840 |
| DOI | 10.3748/wjg.v25.i41.6172 |
Cover
| Summary: | In recent years, there has been a critical change in treatment paradigms in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) triggered by the arrival of new effective treatments aiming to prevent disease progression, bowel damage and disability. The insufficiency of symptomatic disease control and the well-known discordance between symptoms and objective measures of disease activity lead to the need of reviewing conventional treatment algorithms and developing new concepts of optimal therapeutic strategy. The treat-to-target strategies, defined by the selecting therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease consensus recommendation, move away from only symptomatic disease control and support targeting composite therapeutic endpoints (clinical and endoscopical remission) and timely assessment. Emerging data suggest that early therapy using a treat-to-target approach and an algorithmic therapy escalation using regular disease monitoring by clinical and biochemical markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) leads to improved outcomes. This review aims to present the emerging strategies and supporting evidence in the current therapeutic paradigm of IBD including the concepts of "early intervention", "treat-to-target" and "tight control" strategies. We also discuss the real-word experience and applicability of these new strategies and give an overview on the future perspectives and areas in need of further research and potential improvement regarding treatment targets and ("tight") disease monitoring strategies. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 Author contributions: All authors equally contributed to this paper with conception and design of the study, literature review and analysis, drafting and critical revision and editing, and final approval of the final version; Bessissow T reviewed and language edited the submitted version of the manuscript. Telephone: +1-514-9341934 Fax: +1-514-9344452 Corresponding author: Peter Laszlo Lakatos, DSc, FRCP (C), MD, Full Professor, Staff Physician, Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal H3G 1A4, Quebec, Canada. peter.lakatos@mcgill.ca |
| ISSN: | 1007-9327 2219-2840 2219-2840 |
| DOI: | 10.3748/wjg.v25.i41.6172 |