How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany

Germany has an ambitious climate target for 2030 that cannot be achieved without reducing the high share of coal in power generation. In the face of this, the government has recently decided to directly phase out coal capacity. Yet implementing such a policy comes with two important risks: (1) the d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergy economics Vol. 87; p. 104730
Main Authors Osorio, Sebastian, Pietzcker, Robert C., Pahle, Michael, Edenhofer, Ottmar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.03.2020
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0140-9883
1873-6181
DOI10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104730

Cover

More Information
Summary:Germany has an ambitious climate target for 2030 that cannot be achieved without reducing the high share of coal in power generation. In the face of this, the government has recently decided to directly phase out coal capacity. Yet implementing such a policy comes with two important risks: (1) the decommissioning path might actually be insufficient to reach the 2030 climate target; and (2) the waterbed effect that arises from any additional national policy within the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) cap. In this paper, we quantify these risks using the numerical electricity market model LIMES-EU, and consider options for dealing with them. Our results show that the coal capacity phase out risks missing the 2030 target slightly, but a carbon price floor of at least 35 €/tCO2 would eliminate this risk. Further, we find a substantial waterbed effect, which could be partly alleviated through a carbon price floor coalition of countries, and even fully by cancelling 1.1 GtCO2 of certificates. Yet given the difficulties and challenges that come with either option, members implementing a carbon price floor policy should advocate extending it to the full EU ETS level. •The CPO path proposed by the Coal Commission risks missing the 2030 target slightly.•In Germany a CO2 price of 34 €/tCO2 allows the country to achieve its 2030 target.•This would require a carbon price support of 13 €/tCO2 in addition to the ETS.•The MSR and implementation by more countries limit the waterbed effect temporarily.•Germany would need to cancel around 1.1 GtCO2 EUA to avoid the waterbed effect.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0140-9883
1873-6181
DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104730