Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation of "healthy" joints in young subjects with severe haemophilia A

Summary Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) are increasingly used in haemophilia A (HA) to detect early joint changes. A total of 40 clinically asymptomatic joints, never involved by bleeding events [“healthy joints” (HJ)], were evaluated by MRI and, in parallel, by US in 20 yo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. e167 - e173
Main Authors Di Minno, M. N. D., Iervolino, S., Soscia, E., Tosetto, A., Coppola, A., Schiavulli, M., Marrone, E., Ruosi, C., Salvatore, M., Di Minno, G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1351-8216
1365-2516
1365-2516
DOI10.1111/hae.12107

Cover

More Information
Summary:Summary Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (US) are increasingly used in haemophilia A (HA) to detect early joint changes. A total of 40 clinically asymptomatic joints, never involved by bleeding events [“healthy joints” (HJ)], were evaluated by MRI and, in parallel, by US in 20 young subjects with severe HA (22.45 ± 2.72 years old; no history of arthritides, of viral infections or of inhibitors against factor VIII). The same joints were evaluated in 20 matched non‐haemophilic (no‐HA) subjects (mean age 23.90 ± 2.31 years, P = 0.078 vs. HA subjects). US images were obtained with specific probe positions according to validated procedures. A validated US score and progressive (P‐MRI) and additive (A‐MRI) MRI scores were employed for data collection and analysis. The US score was higher in HA than in no‐HA subjects (3.40 ± 1.72 vs. 0.80 ± 1.10, P < 0.001). Taking into account only moderate/severe alterations, joint effusion was found in 55% of HA and in 5% of no‐HA joints (P < 0.001); synovial hypertrophy was found in 20% of HA and in none of the no‐HA joints; cartilage erosion was found in 30% of HA and in none of no‐HA joints. MRI examinations confirmed these findings and the US score correlated with the A‐MRI (r = 0.732, P < 0.001) and with the P‐MRI (r = 0.598, P < 0.001) scores. MRI and US data significantly correlated as to effusion (r = 0.819, P = 0.002), synovial hypertrophy (r = 0.633, P = 0.036) and cartilage erosion (r = 0.734, P = 0.010). Despite inherent limitations, joint US examination identified subclinical abnormalities of HJ in young subjects with severe HA.
Bibliography:ArticleID:HAE12107
ark:/67375/WNG-5ZGGPKJ1-0
istex:2FC2E7F55457C5A5BAB1E4BA2A33741A369E7C19
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1351-8216
1365-2516
1365-2516
DOI:10.1111/hae.12107