Multi-site placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial to assess protection following oral immunisation with inactivated non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background Previous studies identified factors that modify response to an oral non‐typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) vaccine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): severe COPD, moderate–severe exacerbations as end‐point and a threshold prevalence of NTHi in the study population. More...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternal medicine journal Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. 684 - 693
Main Authors Clancy, R. L., Dunkley, M. L., Sockler, J., McDonald, C. F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 01.06.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1444-0903
1445-5994
DOI10.1111/imj.13072

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Previous studies identified factors that modify response to an oral non‐typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) vaccine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): severe COPD, moderate–severe exacerbations as end‐point and a threshold prevalence of NTHi in the study population. More data are needed to confirm parameters that influence clinical outcomes. Aims The primary aim was to determine the efficacy of an oral NTHi vaccine (HI‐164OV) in reducing the rate of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids or hospitalisation in COPD. Secondary aims included effect on the proportion of patients experiencing such exacerbations, severity of infections and quality of life (St George Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD patients (SGRQ‐C)). Methods This multi‐centre, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study was conducted at 21 Australian sites for 9 months in 2011. Results Three‐hundred and twenty subjects with COPD, FEV1 <60% predicted and ≥1 moderate–severe exacerbations in the previous 12 months were recruited. The primary and secondary end‐points for the intention‐to‐treat population aged 40–88 years were not achieved, and only 5% of subjects had an H. influenzae‐positive sputum sample. Subsequent exploratory analysis of patients <65 years (91 subjects) indicated protection with respect to the primary and most of the secondary end‐points, with SGRQ‐C symptom scores lower at 3 and 6 months. Conclusion Patients aged 40–88 years with moderate to severe COPD and low rates of H. influenzae‐positive sputum were not protected against exacerbations by HI‐1640V. Further studies are needed to confirm protection in subjects aged <65 years. Older age and low colonisation rates appear to affect adversely response to this vaccine.
Bibliography:ArticleID:IMJ13072
ark:/67375/WNG-7JCNVDQC-Q
istex:875773CF9A29C6E690466A35FDBEA909D7B5E8D4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1444-0903
1445-5994
DOI:10.1111/imj.13072