Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of a Specific Agility Test and Its Relationship With Physical Fitness in Karate Athletes

The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of a developed specific karate agility test (SKAT) and to examine its relationship with physical fitness. A total of 36 karateka voluntarily participated in this study. During two separate sessions, international and national rank...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in physiology Vol. 13; p. 841498
Main Authors Ben Hassen, Said, Negra, Yassine, Uthoff, Aaron, Chtara, Moktar, Jarraya, Mohamed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 23.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI10.3389/fphys.2022.841498

Cover

More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of a developed specific karate agility test (SKAT) and to examine its relationship with physical fitness. A total of 36 karateka voluntarily participated in this study. During two separate sessions, international and national ranked athletes completed the SKAT by performing three changes of direction (CoD): two in a preplanned manner and one in response to a stimulus that was provided by a live tester (Light tester). Assessment of CoD, horizontal jumping ability, 5 and 10 m sprint time, and dynamic balance were also applied during these two occasions. To evaluate SKAT’s construct validity, two groups were recruited based on their karate results: High- vs. low-ranked athletes. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the SKAT were examined from the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest worthwhile change (SWC), and receiving operator characteristic analysis. Regarding relative and absolute reliability, the ICC of SKAT was excellent at >0.95 and the SEM was <5%. According to the sensitivity analysis, the power to detect small performance changes can be rated as “good” in karate athletes (SWC > SEM). The SKAT showed a moderate relationship with the CoD, jumping, sprint, and dynamic balance tests. High-ranked athletes were better than their low-ranked counterparts on SKAT (Cohen’s d = 2.00). The area under the receiving operator characteristic curve was 0.76. To sum up, the SKAT is a reliable and valid tool to assess the agility performance of karatekas and can be used by conditioning trainers to detect “true” performance changes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Edited by: David Bentley, Flinders University, Australia
Reviewed by: Miguel-Angel Gomez-Ruano, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain; Nebojša Trajković, University of Niš, Serbia
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2022.841498