Comparative Effectiveness of Focused Extracorporeal versus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis—Randomized Controlled Study

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 19; no. 15; p. 9001
• Main Authors: Ko, Nai-Yu, Chang, Chih-Ning, Cheng, Chu-Han, Yu, Hui-Kung, Hu, Gwo-Chi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 24.07.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Anti-inflammatory agents; Arthritis; Disease; Exercise; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Pain; Patients; Performance evaluation; Walking
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159001

Both focused extracorporeal shockwave (f-ESWT) and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (r-ESWT) can alleviate symptoms in patients with knee osteoarthritis, but no trials have directly compared f-ESWT with r-ESWT for knee osteoarthritis. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of f-ESWT and r-ESWT on knee osteoarthritis. Forty-two patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to receive three sessions of either f-ESWT or r-ESWT at 1-week intervals. The patients were evaluated at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks after the final treatment. The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity, as measured on the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), range of motion of the knee joint, and the 6-minute walk test. At the end of 4 weeks, the VAS score was substantially reduced in both groups (f-ESWT, −4.5 ± 2.5 points; r-ESWT, −2.6 ± 2.0 points), with a greater reduction in the f-ESWT group. Both groups showed significant improvement in secondary outcomes; however, the f-ESWT group yielded greater improvement in the VAS score, WOMAC score, and 6-minute walk test. Our results showed that f-ESWT was more effective than r-ESWT in improving pain and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.