Evaluation and Improvement of No-Ground-Truth Dual Band Algorithm for Shallow Water Depth Retrieval: A Case Study of a Coastal Island

Conventional bathymetric inversion approaches require bathymetric data as ground truth to obtain shallow water depth from high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Thus, bathymetric mapping methods that do not require inputs from in situ measurements are highly desirable. In this paper, we pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRemote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 14; no. 24; p. 6231
Main Authors Yang, Qingjie, Chen, Jianyu, Chen, Benqing, Tao, Bangyi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.12.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2072-4292
2072-4292
DOI10.3390/rs14246231

Cover

More Information
Summary:Conventional bathymetric inversion approaches require bathymetric data as ground truth to obtain shallow water depth from high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. Thus, bathymetric mapping methods that do not require inputs from in situ measurements are highly desirable. In this paper, we propose a dual-band model improvement method and evaluate the performance of this novel dual-band model approach to obtain the underwater terrain around a coastal island by using four WorldView-2/3 imageries. Then, we validate the results through changing water column properties with the Kd multiple linear regression model simulated by Hydrolight. We multiply the best coefficient and blue–green band value with different substrates on the pixels, which sample along the coastal line and isobath. The results show that the mean bias of inversed depth ranges from 1.73 to 2.96 m in the four imageries. The overall accuracy of root mean square errors (RMSEs) is better for depths shallower than 10 m, and the average relative error is 11.89%. The inversion accuracy of this new model is higher than Lee’s classical Kd model and has a wider range of applications than Chen’s dual-band model. The no-ground-truth dual-band algorithm has higher accuracy than the other log-ratio methods mentioned in this paper.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Case Study-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2072-4292
2072-4292
DOI:10.3390/rs14246231