Using Ground Penetrating Radar and Resistivity Methods to Locate Unmarked Graves: A Review

The location of unmarked graves in forensic and archaeological investigations is legally and culturally important. In a forensic context, locating covert burials of missing persons can provide closure to the family, as well as facilitating the successful prosecution of the individual(s) responsible....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRemote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 13; no. 15; p. 2880
Main Authors Berezowski, Victoria, Mallett, Xanthé, Ellis, Justin, Moffat, Ian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2072-4292
2072-4292
DOI10.3390/rs13152880

Cover

More Information
Summary:The location of unmarked graves in forensic and archaeological investigations is legally and culturally important. In a forensic context, locating covert burials of missing persons can provide closure to the family, as well as facilitating the successful prosecution of the individual(s) responsible. Archaeologically, burials provide an important source of information about health, diet, physical anthropology, and culture. Despite the importance of these features, the location of unmarked graves with conventional archaeological and forensic techniques, such as excavation, is difficult and expensive. As a result, geophysical techniques have been widely applied to the location of unmarked graves as they are non-invasive, cost and time effective, and avoid the unnecessary disturbance of human remains. This article brings together the literature on ground penetrating radar (GPR), and two resistivity methods, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and fixed probe resistivity (FPR), on their ability to locate burials and reviews their use in forensic and archaeological investigations. This paper aims to provide law enforcement personnel, archaeologists, geophysicists, and interested academics with an overview of how these techniques work, how they have been previously applied to grave detection, and the strengths and weakness of these methods.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2072-4292
2072-4292
DOI:10.3390/rs13152880