Effect of natural gas direct injection (NGDI) on the performance and knock behavior of an SI engine
•The influence of natural gas direct injection on gasoline port injection engine is investigated.•CO and CO2 emissions reduced when RCNG increased.•RI decreased by 88.6 % for RCNG = 100 % and CR = 12.5 compared to pure gasoline.•Addition of 25 % of CNG reduced the knock occurrence significantly. The...
Saved in:
Published in | Energy conversion and management Vol. 269; p. 116145 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.10.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0196-8904 1879-2227 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116145 |
Cover
Summary: | •The influence of natural gas direct injection on gasoline port injection engine is investigated.•CO and CO2 emissions reduced when RCNG increased.•RI decreased by 88.6 % for RCNG = 100 % and CR = 12.5 compared to pure gasoline.•Addition of 25 % of CNG reduced the knock occurrence significantly.
The unique properties of natural gas (NG), including high availability and lower cost compared with other fossil fuels, make it attractive in internal combustion engine (ICE) application. NG is composed mainly of methane and has greater knock resistance than gasoline, enabling higher compression ratios (CR). In contrast with the distinctive advantages, the NG fueled engines suffer from lower power and torque outputs. To address the subject, this study proposes an approach employing NG direct injection (NGDI) strategy (with higher volumetric efficiency unlike port injection), enabling a higher CR irrespective of knock limit. This work applies reactive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate spark ignited co-combustion of direct-injected NG with port-admitted gasoline. The results are validated against experimental data. In all simulated cases, the equivalence ratio (i.e., ∅ = 1) and the total input energy are kept constant. Engine performance is evaluated for three CRs (10.5, 11.5, and 12.5:1), five proportion of CNG (RCNG) and at part- and full-load conditions at an engine speed of 1500 rpm. Results indicated that while running RCNG = 100 % with a CR of 10.5:1, carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions were decreased by 29.3 % and 23.5 % respectively, compared to RCNG = 0 %. The corresponding emission reduction at CR = 11.5:1 was 27.1 % and 24 %; at CR = 12.5:1 they were 29.6 % and 23.5 % respectively. At each CR, the knock intensity at full load fell significantly as the percentage of NG increased. At a CR of 12.5:1, ringing intensity (RI) at full load decreased by 88.6 % when using RCNG = 100 %, instead of RCNG = 0 %. Under the same conditions, RCNG = 25 % cut RI by 56 %. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0196-8904 1879-2227 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116145 |