People Living with Chronic Pain Experience a High Prevalence of Decision Regret in Canada: A Pan-Canadian Online Survey

• Published in: Medical decision making Vol. 45; no. 4; pp. 462 - 479
• Main Authors: Naye, Florian, Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick, Sasseville, Maxime, Cachinho, Chloé, Gérard, Thomas, Toupin-April, Karine, Dubois, Olivia, Paquette, Jean-Sébastien, LeBlanc, Annie, Gaboury, Isabelle, Poitras, Marie-Ève, Li, Linda C., Hoens, Alison M., Poirier, Marie-Dominique, Légaré, France, Décary, Simon
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.05.2025
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Canada - epidemiology; Chronic Pain - epidemiology; Chronic Pain - psychology; Chronic Pain - therapy; Cross-Sectional Studies; Decision Making; Emotions; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Surveys and Questionnaires; Canada; decision regret scale; survey; chronic pain; decision regret
• ISSN: 0272-989X; 1552-681X
• DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251326069

Background (1) To estimate the prevalence of decision regret in chronic pain care, and (2) to identify factors associated with decision regret. Design We conducted a pan-Canadian cross-sectional online survey and reported the results following the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines. We recruited a sample of adults experiencing chronic noncancer pain. We used a stratified proportional random sampling based on the population and chronic pain prevalence of each province. We measured decision regret with the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) and decisional needs with the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. We performed descriptive analysis to estimate the prevalence and level of decision regret and multilevel multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with regret according to the STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies recommendations. Results We surveyed 1,649 people living with chronic pain, and 1,373 reported a most difficult decision from the 10 prespecified ones, enabling the collection of a DRS score. On a scale ranging from 0 to 100 where 1 reflects the presence of decision regret and 25 constitutes important decision regret, the mean DRS score in our sample was 28.8 (s = 19.6). Eighty-four percent of respondents experienced some decision regret and 50% at an important level. We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option. Respondents with low education level and higher decisional conflict experienced more decision regret when the decision was deemed difficult. Conclusions This pan-Canadian survey highlighted a high prevalence and level of decision regret associated with difficult decisions for pain care. Decision making in pain care could be enhanced by addressing factors that contribute to decision regret. Highlights We conducted an online pan-Canadian survey and collected responses from a wide diversity of people living with chronic pain. More than 84% of respondents experienced decision regret and approximately 50% at an important level. We identified 15 factors associated with decision regret, including 4 personal and 9 decision-making characteristics, and 2 consequences of the chosen option. Our pan-Canadian survey reveals an urgent need of a shared decision-making approach in chronic pain care that can be potentiated by targeting multiple factors associated with decision regret.